정품 윈도우와 변조된 윈도우 차이점...펌
Harrison Group White Paper:
Genuine Microsoft Products
Vs. Pirated Counterparts
Prepared by:
Case Braskamp
Jake Soffronoff
Date:
August 26, 2011
Sponsored By:
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
2
Table of Contents
IN THIS WHITE PAPER ............................................................................................................................................ 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 4
COUNTERFEIT USERS MAKE SIGNIFICANT SACRIFICES .............................................................................................................. 5
METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................................. 7
SECURITY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Viruses, Worms and Trojans Found in Pirated Versions ........................................................................................ 7
Vulnerability Regardless of Channel ..................................................................................................................... 8
Pirated Software Often Unable to Download Updates ......................................................................................... 8
PERFORMANCE & PRODUCTIVITY ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Genuine Microsoft Users Experience Superior Performance than Users of Counterfeit Products ........................ 8
Genuine Microsoft Windows Boots Faster ............................................................................................................ 9
Genuine Microsoft Office is More Efficient to Use ................................................................................................ 9
Genuine Microsoft Provides Superior Intranet Performance ................................................................................ 9
Genuine Microsoft is Faster When Loading Popular Text-and-Graphics Heavy Web Pages ................................. 9
POWER CONSUMPTION & BATTERY LIFE ............................................................................................................................. 9
Genuine Microsoft is More Energy Efficient When Performing Processor-Intensive Tasks................................. 10
Genuine Microsoft is More Energy Efficient Both in and Coming out of Sleep Mode ......................................... 10
Genuine Microsoft Machines Enjoy Longer Battery Life ..................................................................................... 10
IN SUMMARY: IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNTERFEIT USERS ....................................................................................................... 11
How to Recognize Counterfeit Software ............................................................................................................. 11
Support for Windows XP and Office 2003 is in the Process of Being Phased Out ............................................... 11
Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................... 12
APPENDICES......................................................................................................................................................... 12
APPENDIX I: METHODOLOGIES FOR PERFORMANCE & PRODUCTIVITY TESTS ............................................................................ 13
APPENDIX II: METHODOLOGIES FOR SECURITY TESTS........................................................................................................... 16
APPENDIX III: METHODOLOGIES FOR POWER CONSUMPTION TESTS ....................................................................................... 17
APPENDIX IV: HARDWARE CONFIGURATIONS..................................................................................................................... 19
APPENDIX V: SOFTWARE CONFIGURATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 20
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
3
In This White Paper
This white paper presents the results of a series of independently-run tests that were designed to
discover differences between genuine and counterfeit installations of Microsoft software. It describes
the variation in levels of security, performance and power consumption that were found between
genuine and pirated Microsoft software, and provides some discussion of the implications that these
findings have for business and everyday users alike.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
4
Executive Summary
Despite the fact that, excluding price, people rank reliability and protection against viruses and malicious
code as the most valuable software attributes * , millions of everyday users and businesses entrust their
virtual worlds to software that they obtained from unaccountable resources.
Many users may believe that the risks associated with using counterfeit software are isolated to
programs acquired from the web, but studies demonstrate that is not the case. In fact, users obtain
problematic counterfeit software through a number of channels, including from hardware retailers that
pre-install it on the machines that they sell, or from purchases made at unauthorized retailers, street
markets or through online auctions or suppliers.
In order to investigate the potential ramifications of using pirated software, the Harrison Group
contracted an independent technology benchmarking firm to run and collect data on a series of
comparison tests between genuine Microsoft software and counterfeit versions that had been obtained
from the web, from hardware retailers and from street market stalls. That data was then analyzed by
the Harrison Group in order to identify any security, performance, functionality or resource
consumption differences that existed between the various software packages.
Genuine users enjoy a safer experience than counterfeit users
Our findings confirm that users of counterfeit software are, in fact, opening themselves up to risk of
infection by worms, Trojans and viruses. 24% of the machines running counterfeit software in our study
either became infected at installation, or independently downloaded and installed malicious software
upon connection to the internet. Further, we received malicious software from each of the three
popular distribution channels we tested – peer-to-peer downloads, purchases from street markets, and
purchases from hardware retailers that fail to use genuine Microsoft products. Our results indicated
that the level of risk involved in using pirated software is considerable, and that the risk of exposure
remains high regardless of the software’s source.
* IDC. (2011). The Risks to Consumers from Pirated Software. Framingham: www.idc.com.
Transferred from
another computer or
borrowed from a
friend
7.2%
Downloaded from a
peer-to-peer
network or web site
71.5%
Bought in a store,
from a street market,
or from an online
auction/ supplier
9.1%
Came with the
computer
12.2%
Sources of Improperly
Licensed Software 1
n=550
Base = People known to respondents to use pirated software
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
5
Genuine users enjoy superior performance and productivity than counterfeit users
While few might be surprised to learn that using pirated products comes with an increased risk of
exposure to worms, Trojans and viruses, counterfeit users may not realize that they risk sacrificing
performance by failing to use genuine software.
In a recent study, IDC found that 36% of consumers had installed software on their machines that had
slowed their computer so much that it had to be uninstalled, and 34% reported installing software that
would not run at all * . Our study reinforces these findings, confirming that genuine Microsoft users tend
to enjoy superior performance in the form of faster boot times, faster print times, faster document
loading times, faster loading times when visiting popular text-and-graphics-heavy websites, and faster
intranet page loading times than users of counterfeit products. The reduction in wait time for all of
these common tasks adds up to a more dynamic, productive and satisfying experience for users of
genuine Microsoft products.
Genuine users get power consumption benefits compared to counterfeit users
Another sacrifice that counterfeit users may not realize they are making is in energy efficiency. We
found that computers installed with genuine Microsoft products tend to consume less energy when
performing processor-intensive tasks, when in sleep mode, and when coming out of sleep mode than
their pirated counterparts, all of which adds up to longer battery life, reduced environmental impact,
and lower energy costs for consumers and businesses alike.
Counterfeit users make significant sacrifices
In total, our results indicate that counterfeit users pay a high cost for the low price of counterfeit
software. Users of pirated software are opening themselves up to the potential for both catastrophic
security breaches and significant losses in productivity and performance, regardless of the platform they
use, and regardless of whether the counterfeit software’s source is the web, a street market stall, or an
unprincipled hardware retailer.
* IDC. (2011). The Risks to Consumers from Pirated Software. Framingham: www.idc.com.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
6
Methodology
The Harrison Group contracted an independent technology benchmarking firm to perform a number of
tests and collect data comparing genuine and pirated Microsoft products. That data was then analyzed
by the Harrison Group to discover any variations in the levels of security, performance, functionality and
resource consumption that might exist between genuine and pirated Microsoft products.
The tests for this study were performed in May and June, 2011, by trained personnel using a variety of
genuine and counterfeit Windows and Office software. The different versions of Windows XP, Windows
7, Office 2003 and Office 2007 that were used came from some of the most popular channels of pirated
software distribution, including peer-to-peer file sharing, independent hardware dealers, and street
market stalls, and originated from a wide geographical area, including China and Eastern Europe. The
software was installed on a variety of computer models manufactured by a representative group of
popular brands in order to mitigate the effects that using any specific hardware configuration might
have on the results.
More detail on the specific hardware and software configurations, as well as on the testing
methodologies that were employed for this study, can be found in Appendices I-VI of this document.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
7
Results
In a recent global survey of 25,000 computer users, 36% of consumers reported that they had needed to
uninstall software they had obtained in the past two years because it made their machines too slow,
34% reported installing software that wouldn’t run, 16% reported finding viruses on their computers,
and 15% reported having pop-up ads overrun their machines * . Our test results corroborate what these
users report, and even indicate that the potential risks of using counterfeit software may be greater
than some users believe.
Security
Counterfeit users put themselves at risk by using pirated software, regardless of whether their software
is obtained through Peer-to-Peer file sharing, from a street market, or from a hardware retailer that fails
to install genuine Microsoft products on the machines they sell.
Price excluded, the attribute that users value the most in their software is protection against viruses and
hackers * , yet millions of consumers and businesses still choose to install potentially-infected counterfeit
software on their computers. Computer users are aware of the risks they’re taking: in a recent poll, 53%
of consumers said that they believe that pirated software is either much less secure or dangerously less
secure than properly licensed software, and further said that they believe that 55% of pirated software
web sites and 53% of pirated software from peer-to-peer sharing posed a security risk if used * . Despite
these well-known risks, 4 in 10 software installations today are still improperly licensed * .
Our findings support the suspicion that users feel about the safety of counterfeit software: nearly one in
four (24%) of the pirated operating systems in our study either became infected at installation, or
independently downloaded and installed malicious software upon connection to the internet. Further,
we found worms, Trojans and viruses across both Windows XP and Windows 7 installations, indicating
that no pirated platform was safe from threat, and across all of the distribution channels that we
investigated, indicating that paying for a piece of counterfeit software from a market stall or hardware
retailer does not guarantee its safety.
Viruses, Worms and Trojans Found in Pirated Versions
The viruses that we found in counterfeit Microsoft software ranged from simple worms to annoying
Trojans to particularly malicious and fast-spreading viruses. Some of the specific threats found in
pirated Microsoft installations included:
Helompy.A, a worm that spreads itself from machine to machine by either copying itself to
removable media, or by attaching itself to emails sent from the user’s account. Worms like
Helompy.A reduce computer performance and put those in contact with the user’s digital world
at risk of infection.
Deeterohms.A, also known as Generic3_c.HHQ, a Trojan that downloads and installs adware on
an infected computer while masquerading as legitimate software. This adware attempts to take
over the machine’s User Account Controls while downloading any of a number of pieces of
* IDC. (2011). The Risks to Consumers from Pirated Software. Framingham: www.idc.com.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
8
software to the machine without the user’s knowledge or consent. Ultimately, Trojans like
Helompy.A serve as an obtrusive drag on performance while opening users up to potential
threats through downloading unwanted software from the internet.
Generic16.CJLD, a virus that deletes important files from any machine it infects while hijacking
the OS and its network tools. once infected, the virus opens a network back door through
which hackers can access any data on computer, including personal and financial information.
The virus then uses the backdoor to spread readily through local area networks and infect other
machines that are then open to the same risks.
While the level of harm inflicted by each threat varies, the existence of an unknown threat across all
platforms and channels of distribution should give users pause when deciding whether or not test their
luck with an unknown source.
Vulnerability Regardless of Channel
Those who purchase pirated software may feel that their seller has a vested interest in ensuring that the
software they buy is safe, but our results do not support that theory. While it would not come as a shock
to most that we found viruses and Trojans in our study’s peer-to-peer downloads, we also received
infected software through purchases at street markets, and pre-installed on hardware that was sold by
retailers who failed to use genuine Microsoft products.
This work leads us to conclude that the level of risk involved in using pirated software is considerable,
and that the risk of exposure remains high regardless of the software’s source.
Pirated Software Often Unable to Download Updates
Regularly downloading updates for the software that users employ is a vital part of maintaining a secure
and efficient computing experience. one in four of the counterfeit versions of Microsoft software
tested in our study was unable to download automatic Windows and Office updates, and one in five was
also unable to manually install Windows updates. As with the risk of virus exposure, the inability to
download automatic updates was found across all platforms, and was found both in software that had
been downloaded for free and in software that had been purchased from a street market or hardware
retailer.
The inability to download updates affects users by preventing them from patching any security
vulnerabilities that may exist in their software, by preventing them from incorporating updated features
that have been made available to paying customers, and eventually by leaving them with software that
is out of date and prone to attack. By choosing to download or purchase counterfeit software, both
consumers and businesses may be choosing to work in a less efficient computing environment that
simultaneously opens them up to additional security risks.
Performance & Productivity
Genuine Microsoft Users Experience Superior Performance than Users of Counterfeit Products
Waiting for your PC to boot, waiting for documents to open, waiting for the printer to receive your
documents, waiting for a web page to load – whether it comes in the form of one long wait or thousands
of smaller ones, it all adds up to lost productivity and a less elegant user experience. Genuine Microsoft
users enjoy faster boot times, smoother MS-Office performance, faster load times when visiting popular
text-and-graphics-heavy websites, and faster intranet page load times than users of counterfeit
products, which all adds up to a more dynamic, productive and satisfying user experience.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
9
Genuine Microsoft Windows Boots Faster
Perhaps the most universal and annoying wait of all is the time spent waiting for a computer to boot. In
boot time tests, genuine Windows machines outperformed those with pirated installations 60% of the
time by an average of 56%. Recapturing this time on a daily basis at work and at home would be a boon
for most users. Less time spent waiting is more time spent being productive, connecting with friends and
family, or having fun on your PC.
Genuine Microsoft Office is More Efficient to Use
Throughout your workday, you probably experience many small waits. Waiting for documents to load,
waiting for your work to be sent to the printer – in the course of a normal workday, these small waits
can add up to a lot of time. In a series of tests designed to measure these waits, we found significant
advantages for genuine users when performing a number of everyday tasks in Microsoft Office.
PCs running genuine Windows and MS-Office products outperformed their pirated counterparts 75% of
the time by an average of 52% when opening the kinds of multiple-sheet Excel documents that
businesses use every day. Further, in tests measuring the time it takes to print 500kb or 1mb Word
documents, genuine machines were faster than their pirated counterparts in half (48%) of the test
configurations by an average of 56%. Considering the frequency with which these tasks are completed,
over the long term these advantages can mean significant productivity gains for businesses and
consumers alike.
Genuine Microsoft Provides Superior Intranet Performance
Whether it’s sharing calendars or large-scale data sources, many modern businesses provide significant
amounts of information over intranet websites. In a series of tests measuring load times for intranet
websites, genuine Windows products demonstrated far superior performance than their pirated
counterparts – 67% of the time the genuine Microsoft products were an average of 100% faster. Aside
from the peace of mind that using genuine products provides, this advantage could mean very large
productivity gains for enterprises for whom the use of internal websites is key to productivity.
Genuine Microsoft is Faster When Loading Popular Text-and-Graphics Heavy Web Pages
As websites have evolved over time to include more graphics and information, users have been
subjected to regular waits that can last from milliseconds to minutes. In a test measuring the time it
took to load popular Internet web pages that were heavy with text and graphics, PCs running genuine
Windows outperformed their pirated counterparts 59% of the time by an average of 46%. By shortening
these waits, genuine users save a significant amount of time – and businesses gain worker productivity –
as they surf the net.
Power Consumption & Battery Life
Computers installed with genuine Windows and Office software are more energy efficient than their
pirated counterparts, which leads to lower energy costs for users, longer battery life for genuine Laptops,
and a more environmentally friendly experience for everyone.
Whether you are a road warrior who depends on that extra bit of battery life, or you are just trying to
control costs, energy efficiency is an area of concern due to its ramifications on battery life, energy
costs, and the environmental impact of computing. A majority of the PCs installed with genuine
Microsoft Windows and Office software in our study consumed less energy and exhibited superior
battery life than their pirated counterparts.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
10
Genuine Microsoft is More Energy Efficient When Performing Processor-Intensive Tasks
The genuine Microsoft installations in our study demonstrated significantly superior energy efficiency
than their pirated counterparts while performing processor-intensive operations.
In a test measuring how much power is consumed while running processor-intensive programs for an
hour, genuine Windows machines outperformed pirated operating systems 60% of the time by an
average of 20%. In a test measuring how much power is consumed when watching a high definition
movie, half (47%) of the genuine-installed machines in our study consumed an average of 25% less
power than their pirated counterparts. These drains add up to significant additional energy costs (and
adverse environmental impact) over the life of a computer and would negatively affect laptop users’
battery life, which is a particular concern business and media-inclined road warriors looking to squeeze
every ounce of performance from their machines while travelling or working in the field.
Genuine Microsoft is More Energy Efficient Both in and Coming out of Sleep Mode
Genuine Microsoft products are consistently more energy efficient than their pirated counterparts when
either in or coming out of sleep mode.
In a test measuring how much power is consumed by a computer when the operating system is in sleep
mode with no programs running, the machines installed with genuine Microsoft software outperformed
those with pirated installations more than half (62%) of the time by an average of nearly 8%. When
coming out of sleep mode, the genuine-installed machines consumed an average of 17% less power over
half (53%) of the time. Considering that many people routinely leave their machines in sleep mode
instead of shutting down at the end of a session, these numbers can add up to a significant increase in
energy efficiency for genuine users over the life of an average computer.
Genuine Microsoft Machines Enjoy Longer Battery Life
In light of our results on power consumption, it was not surprising to find that laptops installed with
genuine Windows operating systems demonstrated significantly longer battery life in over half (56%) of
the test configurations in our study. on average, these laptops experienced nearly 26 extra minutes of
computer use per charge, which would be a very nice pick up for those who need their machines to stay
“alive” while working remotely in order to remain productive, or for those who simply want to get the
most out of their machines.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
11
In Summary: Implications for Counterfeit Users
Users of pirated Microsoft software open their digital worlds to threatening security vulnerabilities while
running the risk of sacrificing performance, productivity and energy efficiency. Our study demonstrates
that, regardless of the software configuration employed, and regardless of whether the counterfeit
software’s source is the web, a street market stall or an unprincipled hardware retailer, the low price of
using counterfeit software comes at a high cost. How to Recognize Counterfeit Software *
Our research makes it clear that the risks run by those using pirated software are both real and
potentially costly. There are several cues that can help those who are unsure about the legitimacy of
their Microsoft software to recognize counterfeit versions:
Source: 8-in-10 of the users running improperly licensed software obtained it online
through a website or peer-to-peer network, purchased it through an online auction or
supplier, or purchased it through a street market or store. In order to be sure that users
obtain genuine software, they should instead purchase it either directly from Microsoft,
or from an authorized Microsoft retailer.
Activation: Genuine Microsoft software requires activation and validation at
installation. If a user is not required to enter a genuine Microsoft product key at
installation, the chances are that they are installing counterfeit software.
Updates: Users running genuine Microsoft software receive automatic security and
feature updates. If a piece of software is unable to receive automatic updates, there is a
good chance that it is not genuine and that it is therefore vulnerable to sacrificed
performance and security threats.
Labeling: Genuine Microsoft discs are labeled with a hologram and come with a
certificate of authenticity. Counterfeiters are now able to convincingly replicate
Microsoft’s sophisticated labeling, however, so the presence of a hologram should not
be used as the sole indicator of a piece of software’s validity.
Support for Windows XP and Office 2003 is in the Process of Being Phased Out
All users should be aware that in April, 2009 Microsoft moved the Windows XP and Office 2003 software
platforms from Mainstream to Extended support. While users are still able to receive monthly security
updates, they are no longer able to make warranty claims or receive free technical support. Further, In
April, 2014 all Windows XP and Microsoft Office 2003 support, including security updates and security-
related hot-fixes, will be terminated. This will leave anyone still using Windows XP and Office 2003
vulnerable to performance and security threats, and those most at risk will be those whose pirated
software has left their machines the longest unprotected.
* IDC. (2011). The Risks to Consumers from Pirated Software. Framingham: www.idc.com
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
12
Conclusion
Given the risks identified in this study, all users – particularly businesses with long-term deployment
timeframes – would be well served to upgrade to genuine Microsoft Windows and Office products.
Employing genuine software allows users to protect the performance they experience and the security
of their personal and professional information. All users should verify that the software that they run is
genuine, and if it’s not they should acquire an upgrade either from Microsoft directly, or from an
authorized Microsoft retailer.
Appendice s
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
13
Appendix I: Methodologies for Performance & Productivity Tests
Test Measuring… Testing Method
Average time to
open a multipage
Excel
spreadsheet.
Preconditions:
o Put the test file on the desktop.
o Set Excel Macro security to low.
o Select Auto Scroll in Procmon’s edit menu.
o Select Always on Top under Procmon Options.
Procmon filters added:
o Process name: EXCEL.EXE.
o Operation: Process Start.
o Operation: CloseFile.
Testing method:
1. Open Procmon.
2. Open multipage excel spreadsheet.
3. When data stops scrolling for 5+ seconds record time reading from
last entry.
4. Subtract the process start time from the last entry time and record
the result.
5. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Average time to
print a 500kb
Word document.
Preconditions:
o Add a local printer.
Procmon filters added:
o Operation: Create File.
o Operation: Close File.
o Path Contain: xxtestprintxx.
Testing method:
1. Open Procmon.
2. Open 500kb Word document (“xxtestprintxx”).
3. Select File – Print.
4. Click on “Ok” to print.
5. Subtract the process start time from the end time and record the
result.
6. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
14
Appendix I: Methodologies for Performance & Productivity Tests, Cont’d
Test Measuring… Testing Method
Average time to
print a 1mb
Word document.
Preconditions:
o Add a local printer.
Procmon filters added:
o Operation: Create File.
o Operation: Close File.
o Path Contain: xxtestprintxx.
Testing method:
1. Open Procmon.
2. Open 1mb Word document (“xxtestprintxx”).
3. Select File – Print.
4. Click on “Ok” to print.
5. Subtract the process start time from the end time and record the
result.
6. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Average time to
print a 5mb
Word document.
Preconditions:
o Add local printer.
Procmon filters added:
o Operation: Create File.
o Operation: Close File.
o Path Contain: xxtestprintxx.
Testing method:
1. Open Procmon.
2. Open 5mb Word document (“xxtestprintxx”).
3. Select File – Print.
4. Click on “Ok” to print.
5. Subtract the process start time from the end time and record the
result.
6. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Average time to
load an intranet
web page.
1. Use http://www.numion.com/Stopwatch/index.html to open and
close an intranet web page and record the time.
2. Clear browsing history and cache before each test.
3. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
15
Appendix I: Methodologies for Performance & Productivity Tests, Cont’d
Test Measuring… Testing Method
Average time to
load an intranet
web page heavy
with text.
1. Use http://www.numion.com/Stopwatch/index.html to open and
close an intranet web page and record the time.
2. Clear browsing history and cache before each test.
3. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Average time to
load an intranet
web page heavy
with graphics.
1. Use http://www.numion.com/Stopwatch/index.html to open a
graphic intranet web page and record the time to a log file.
2. Clear browsing history and cache before each test.
3. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Average time to
load a commonly
visited internet
web page heavy
with graphics and
text.
1. Use http://www.numion.com/Stopwatch/index.html to open
Internet Explorer and access http://www.microsoft.com.
2. Clear browsing history and cache before each test.
3. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
16
Appendix II: Methodologies for Security Tests
Test Measuring… Testing Method
Ability to install
automatic
Microsoft OS
updates.
1. Set operating system to check for automatic updates.
2. Check for automatic download of updates.
Ability to install
manual
Microsoft OS
updates.
1. Search for manual updates on the Microsoft website.
2. Download and run the manual updates.
3. Check for download and installation of manual updates.
Boot time.
Preconditions:
o Fresh install of OS under test.
o Install manufacturer’s hardware drivers.
o Run all windows recommended updates.
o No third party applications installed.
o System configured to boot into windows without logon screen.
Testing method:
1. Add a shortcut to notepad in windows startup.
2. Launch Procmon.
3. Select Options > Enable Boot Logging and select OK.
4. Restart computer.
5. Launch Procmon.
6. Save the boot log to the desktop.
7. Open the boot log file.
8. Record the time of the first process start and the start time of
notepad.exe.
9. Calculate boot time by subtracting the first boot time from the start
time of notepad.
10. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Presence of
viruses.
1. Run AVG full virus scan.
2. Monitor network traffic and analyze results to find irregularities.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
17
Appendix III: Methodologies for Power Consumption Tests
Test Measuring… Testing Method
Battery life
1. Ensure that battery is fully charged.
2. Configure Windows Media Player to loop playback.
3. Disconnect the laptop from non-battery power supply and record
time.
4. Play a looping HD AVI movie.
5. Ping computer being tested from a second computer every 30
seconds, then record time when the ping test fails.
6. Subtract the start time from the end time to get total battery life.
Time to recharge
its battery.
1. Ensure that the battery is dead.
2. Start a stopwatch.
3. Plug in the machine to charge the battery.
4. Stop the stopwatch when the computer's battery is fully charged,
record time.
Power
consumption
while running
processor
intensive
programs for an
hour.
1. Ensure that the laptop is sitting idle and that the battery is at least
charged to 75%.
2. Calibrate JouleMeter software.
3. Start Internet Explorer.
4. Enter the names of the program executable to run (iexplore.exe).
5. Save the data to a file.
6. Click "Start Saving"
7. Play video from the Microsoft website to completion.
8. Stop saving when the video has completed.
9. Record power consumption.
10. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Power
consumption
during sleep
mode.
1. Remove the battery from the laptop.
2. Connect the machine to a "Kill a Watt" measuring device.
3. Boot the computer and let it go into sleep mode.
4. Record the reading on the "Kill a Watt" device each minute for the
next 5 minutes.
5. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Power
consumption
when coming out
of sleep mode.
1. Remove the battery from the laptop.
2. Connect the machine to a "Kill a Watt" measuring device.
3. Boot the computer and let it go into sleep mode.
4. Wake the computer up by pressing the power button.
5. Record the highest "Kill a Watt" reading over the next minute.
6. Repeat the test 3 times and record the average.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
18
Appendix III: Methodologies for Power Consumption Tests, Cont’d
Test Measuring… Testing Method
Power
consumption
when playing an
HD Movie.
1. Remove the battery from the laptop.
2. Connect the machine to a "Kill a Watt" measuring device.
3. Boot up a high quality video and skip forward to the 30 minute
mark.
4. Play the movie in full screen mode.
6. Record the reading on the "Kill a Watt" device each minute for the
next 5 minutes.
5. Repeat the test 5 times and record the average result.
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
19
Appendix IV: Hardware Configurations
Processor RAM/Hard Drive
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.10 3gb/250gb
AMD II 2.29 3gb/250gb
Turion II 560 Dual 2.5 3gb/300gb
Pentium R 2.13 2gb/300gb
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.20 3gb/500gb
AMD II 2.19 1.74gb/300gb
Genuine Microsoft Products Vs. Pirated Counterparts
20
Appendix V: Software Configurations
Windows OS Versions Tested MS-Office Versions Tested
Windows 7 Professional SP1 VL Office Pro 2010 FPP
Windows 7 Professional SP1 Office Pro Plus 2010 VL
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 Office Pro Plus 2010
Windows 7 Ultimate Themed Installation Office Pro Plus 2010 FPP
Windows 7 Ultimate Office Pro 2010 VL
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 VL Office Pro 2010
Windows 7 Ultimate VL Office Pro 2003 FFP
Windows 7 Ultimate VL Minimal Installation Office Pro 2003 VL
Windows 7 Ultimate VL Themed Installation
Windows XP Professional SP3
Windows XP Professional SP3 Themed Installation
genuinemsproducts.pdf